Establishing when and where IMC1e acts required localizing the protein and testing its necessity; GFP tagging placed it in the subpellicular network at the time of pellicle formation across zoite stages and identified it as essential for asexual growth.
Evidence GFP tagging with live imaging and attempted double-crossover gene disruption in P. berghei
- Essentiality is inferred from repeated failed disruption rather than a conditional knockdown/knockout phenotype
- The molecular consequence of IMC1e loss on SPN integrity was not measured
- Maternal-allele-only expression in sexual stages was described but its functional significance was not tested